It
is anticipated that sustained long-term support
to research and coherent research groups will
deliver immense overall advantage. Against
this background, the following proposal has
been approved by the Director.
-
A total yearly budget of Rs 3 – 4
crores is available, with the budget likely
to grow (significantly) in the future.
- A
total of 4-5 projects would be approved
every year, each project being proposed
for a period of three or four years.
- Projects
would be selected from detailed proposals
submitted to the Institute. The proposals
would necessarily be in extremely important
and attractive areas. They would be reviewed
by a panel of experts, including some from
outside the Institute, if necessary. The
quality of the proposal would be the primary
factor guiding its selection for financial
support.
- Proposals
would ideally be inter-disciplinary. They
would be developed by a team of faculty
and staff from within the Institute. However,
we do not plan to restrict proposal development
in any manner, at this point of time.
- The
investigators would have considerable flexibility
in using the money, subject to initial approval
by the expert committee.
- Projects
funded by the Institute would be carefully
monitored. Publications, PhD students, and
patents would be used as indicators of success.
-
It is hoped that stable financial support
from within the Institute will enable our
faculty to forge new directions, accept
grand challenges, and make a dent in the
international scene.
In
view of the Institute decision to financially
support research of faculty and staff using
internal resources, the following strategy for
selection and monitoring of projects, including
implementation details and deadlines will be
adopted.
Call
for proposals: Office of Dean: R&D
will announce the call for proposals from the
academic staff of the Institute. The call will
include the Institute position on thrust areas,
though proposals would be welcome from all domains
of science and technology. Interesting proposals
involving social sciences will also be considered.
Proposals can be developed by individuals though
it is likely that high quality proposals would
be inter-disciplinary and hence originate from
a group. Proposals will have to be in the DST
format. Financial support will be provided for
up to a period of three to four years. The quantum
of funding is clearly substantial.
Review
process: Proposals will be reviewed
by a Board-constituted standing committee. The
committee may seek the opinion of international
experts to evaluate the proposal. Such experts
may be suggested by the investigator in the
proposal itself. Quality, originality and the
likelihood of high impact would be the guiding
principles during the evaluation. Presentations
may be arranged to gauge the originality and
importance of the proposed research. The committee
will make decisions with respect to the suitability
of the proposal for financial support as well
as other aspects such as time-frame requested,
cost of equipment, consumables, staff, expenses
towards travel, and workshops-conferences that
the investigator may wish to organize. The recommendation
of the committee, forwarded by Dean: R&D
will be submitted to Director for final approval.
Administrative
issues: The standing committee for
evaluating sponsoring projects from Institute
resources would be composed of the faculty of
the Institute. The committee will have a membership
of six with Dean: R&D as the Chairman. In
addition, each proposal will be independently
reviewed by 2-3 subject experts. Members of
the Departmental Advisory Committee may be drawn
in for the review process as well as discussions.
The standing committee will advise the Board
of Governors on areas of research that the Institute
should undertake and identify areas of collaboration
with leading groups around the world.
Timeline:
Call for proposals would be launched in early
January every year. Proposals will be due on
31st January. Review (internal and external)
is expected to be complete by 31st March. Presentations
would be held in mid-April and all decisions
would be announced by the last week of April.
Reviews of ongoing projects would be arranged
in October each year.
Identifying
areas of research: This step is understandably
the most important. Science and technology evolve
at galloping speeds – an aspect that requires
flexibility in the choice of research disciplines,
investment, as well as faculty recruitment.
Research directions could be driven by pure
excitement and curiosity. More importantly,
certain breakthroughs create new opportunities
and avenues of research. The possibility of
commercializing ideas, products, devices, and
processes will call for sustained funding in
specific areas. Ideas may flow from the industry
or the Government. Research may be driven by
crisis situations or concerns related to national
security. The research community periodically
announces grand challenges with suitable financial
rewards. As an Institute, we may propose to
take on leadership positions in subjects that
we have traditionally excelled in. The emphasis
will vary from one year to the next and will
require continuous discussion. Departments,
Centers, and IRDC will have to provide continuous
advice to the Institute on the choice of focus
areas.
Evaluating
outcome: Progress would be closely
monitored, using external experts, if necessary.
High impact publications would be the first
step in this evaluation. Institute support will
also be viewed as an investment for bringing
in major projects and awards. Contribution to
national goals in missions such as health, communications,
energy, environment, and water will be suitably
recognized.
|